Donald Trump’s bid for the Nobel Peace Prize is unlikely to succeed, thanks to the Norwegian Nobel Committee’s commitment to independence. Despite Trump’s claims that he “deserves it” for ending six wars, the committee insists that its decisions are based solely on the merits of each nominee, unaffected by media attention or public campaigns.
The committee considers each nominee individually, focusing on their achievements and contributions to peace.
A longlist of 338 individuals and organizations is narrowed down to a shortlist, with each name evaluated by an expert.
The winner is chosen based on a thorough discussion, guided by a knowledge base rather than media reports or public opinion.
Norway values multilateralism, which contrasts with Trump’s “America First” policy.Experts see little chance of Trump winning, citing his admiration for Russian leader Vladimir Putin, who has been waging war in Ukraine.
Three Nobel historians have listed reasons why Trump shouldn’t receive the honor, including his stance on Ukraine.
Trump has claimed credit for ending six wars, despite ongoing conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine.
Several foreign leaders, including Benjamin Netanyahu and Ilham Aliyev, have nominated or backed Trump’s nomination.
However, nominations had to be submitted by January 31, just 11 days after Trump took office, making some endorsements potentially too late.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee acts independently, ignoring party politics and government pressure.
Past decisions, like awarding the 2010 prize to Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo, demonstrate the committee’s commitment to its principles.
Kristian Berg Harpviken, secretary of the committee, emphasizes that the committee’s discussions are framed by knowledge, not media attention







