The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has requested clarification from Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, regarding the legal basis of his recent ruling involving the group’s leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. IPOB is seeking to understand the specific written law relied upon in arriving at the ruling and whether such law remains in force.
IPOB emphasizes that no weapons or attack materials were presented in court, and there was no witness testimony alleging any offence under Nigerian or international law.
IPOB reiterates its stance that calls for self-determination are internationally recognized rights, citing the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights.
IPOB references Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution, questioning the conviction of a criminal offence without express definition in written law
IPOB reaffirms its commitment to peaceful advocacy and intends to continue engaging international bodies in pursuit of its goals through lawful and diplomatic channels.
IPOB is examining the judgment and raising constitutional and procedural questions, highlighting implications for human rights, judicial standards, and the rule of law in Nigeria.
The group’s statement reflects its commitment to understanding the legal basis of the ruling and ensuring that Nnamdi Kanu’s rights are protected.